LIU Yanqiao, YONG Shiquan, YANG Xiruo, LI Yadan
Competitive Intelligence. 2026, 22(2): 21-31.
Abstract (
)
Download PDF (
)
Knowledge map
Save
To systematically analyze the current research landscape of open science practice, this study employs a bibliometric analysis base on the Web of Science and core databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), quantitatively revealing the differences between domestic and international research. It further integrates the innovation diffusion theory and the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework to construct a “dynamic-static combination” analytical model. Key findings include:(1)Technology Dimension: The adoption of technology in research exhibits a dual characteristic of demand-oriented compatibility principle (gradual integration of existing technologies) and pragmatism (emphasis on immediate effectiveness), driven by both “top-down” (government governance) and “bottom-up” (public participation) forces.(2)Organization Dimension: The analysis primarily centers on three key entities. The state/government assumes the core role in governance and policy implementation; research institutions/personnel serve as the main actors fostering practice and culture cultivation; society/the public act as deep participants, promoting scientific democratization through mutual empowerment.(3)Environment Dimension: Risks involved in the research are systematically distributed across the physical layer (technological ethics, infrastructures and talents), network layer (international competition, resource allocation), application layer (incentive-evaluation contradictions, personal concerns), and policy layer (lack of top-level design). The environmental representation manifests as the evolution of the research paradigm towards open innovation research (emphasizing transparency, sharing, and collaboration), and the reshaping of collaborative models towards an open innovation ecosystem (characterized by co-opetition and symbiosis among multi-dimensional actors).