MIAO Qihao, ZHANG Zhixiong, LAI Maosheng, ZHANG Wei, MEI Jianming, ZHENG Gang, ZENG Zhonglu, CHEN Feng, CHEN Gong, CHEN Si, TAKAHASHI Fumiyuki, WANG Yuefen, TIAN Yining
Competitive Intelligence. 2026, 22(1): 2-20.
Abstract (
)
Download PDF (
)
Knowledge map
Save
Editor’s Note: Through a decade of perseverance and exploration, Competitive Intelligence completed its transition in 2015 from an internal publication to a formally published journal. Another ten years have since passed. Looking back at the period from 2015 to 2025, the intelligence community—represented by scientific and technological intelligence, competitive intelligence, and business intelligence—has undergone profound and systematic transformations in terms of technological foundations, practical paradigms, and governance mechanisms. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and open-source intelligence (OSINT) have gradually emerged as key driving forces, reshaping the entire intelligence workflow, from information acquisition and analytical assessment to product generation and dissemination. Looking ahead to the next decade (2026–2035), the intelligence field is poised to experience even deeper transformations. How to break through institutional, technological, and cognitive barriers that constrain the realization of intelligence value—achieve true“boundary breaking”—and how to build an open, collaborative, and sustainable intelligence ecosystem that enables “co-evolution” among diverse actors will become core issues confronting the intelligence community. In this process, how can large AI models overcome the challenge of “hallucinations” to achieve high credibility and precise reasoning? How can intelligence more effectively support geopolitical competition and major business decision-making? What new breakthroughs may emerge in intelligence methodologies and technologies? Under increasingly stringent constraints on cross-border data flows and compliance requirements, how can competitive intelligence balance efficiency and security? How can business intelligence shift from a mode of passive response to one of proactive prediction? And how should intelligence education systems be adjusted to cultivate interdisciplinary professionals suited to the evolving landscape? In response to these questions, this journal has invited a number of experts who have long been deeply engaged in both intelligence research and practice to offer perspectives on the development trends of the competitive intelligence field over the next decade, with the aim of providing valuable insights and references for both academia and industry.